• Text size Normal size text | Increase text size by 10% | Increase text size by 20% | Increase text size by 30%

Refugees Magazine Issue 110 (Crisis in the Great Lakes) - Opinion: Everyone is found wanting

Refugees Magazine, 1 December 1997

In Central Africa the principal requirements of refugee law and practice were among the first casualties of the crisis....

By Dennis McNamara

The Great Lakes crisis tested the international community and its willingness or ability to protect refugees in a way seldom seen in recent decades.

Governments, international institutions and NGOs were all found wanting.

The exodus of so many people to Zaire and Tanzania, largely under the control of the killers and sponsors of Rwanda's genoicde, was virtually unique in UNHCR's history. The only comparable crisis, though on a smaller and less organized scale, was the flight of mass murderers and their followers and captives from Cambodia to Thailand in the late 1970s.

In Central Africa, the principal requirements of refugee law and practice were among the first casualties of the crisis and they were flouted and violated from the outset.

Not all populations left Rwanda freely. Their former leaders retained control in newly established refugee camps and civilians wanting to return home were intimidated and, on occasion, killed. Remnants of the Rwandan army and the militias, the Interahamwe, exerted their own odious control over populations of mainly women, children and the elderly.

The location of camps containing hundreds of thousands of Hutus associated with a bloody genocide a few weeks earlier, virtually on the border of the country their leaders had destroyed, was a formula for inevitable conflict.

The OAU Refugee Convention and a 1985 statement of UNHCR's own Executive Committee of governments, specifically provides that asylum states will ensure that camps are located away from sensitive borders and are strictly civilian and humanitarian in nature. In Central Africa the failure of Zaire, and to a lesser extent Tanzania, to implement treaty obligations, set the stage for future violations.

When the camps were not moved, the chance to separate civilian refugees from fighters and génocidaires was lost. UNHCR works with states to ensure that those guilty of crimes against humanity or acts contrary to the principles of the UN and OAU are not treated as refugees but the international obligation remains firstly a state one.

Accusing UNHCR and other humanitarian agencies of this failure is an intentional misrepresentation of treaty obligations. It is similarly unrealistic to suggest that the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda can do more than prosecute a few of the main perpetrators of genocide. It cannot deal with the whole problem.

The consequences of these earlier failures continue to hamstring the resolution of the refugee problem today. An estimated 1.5 million Rwandans and Burundis have returned home in the last two years, some willingly, but most in the absence of realistic or viable alternatives.

Tens of thousands of people have been arbitrarily arrested as suspected génocidaires in Rwanda with no due process to support the suspicions. In Burundi, some returnes have been rounded up and placed in regroupement sites.

Others continue to resist return, both in Democratic Congo and other states. Attempts to screen them have had mixed results; some recognized refugees have been forcibly expelled and a number of states including Rwanda, Democratic Congo and Tanzania have thrown out some asylum seekers before they were even screened; in other cases, suspected génocidaires have successfully avoided return.

It is ironic that the same critics of the earlier failure to separate the génocidaires, attacked the screening process as unnecessary and ultimately contributed to making it unworkable.

Drawing protection lessons from the Great Lakes is a difficult but necessary ongoing process. Some are already relatively clear. It has become obvious for UNHCR that even with the immediate life-saving imperatives of such a dramatic exodus, basic protection concerns must also be equally and fully addressed from the start, and they must be sustained on a consistent basis through the life of the crisis.

They include: an early review of the refugees' profile; the separating out of fighters and killers; the location of camps away from sensitive borders. The support of key regional and international governments is paramount.

Any exodus of Great Lakes proportions raises political and security concerns for involved governments. Legitimate as they may be, they must not be allowed to override basic treaty and moral obligations. Striking the proper balance between real security concerns and humanitarian obligations is an unanswered challenge of the Central Africa experience.

Dennis McNamara is UNHCR's Director of International Protection

Source: Refugees Magazine issue 110 (1997)

• DONATE NOW •

 

• GET INVOLVED • • STAY INFORMED •

UNHCR country pages

Human Rights and Refugee Protection

Self-Study Module 5, Vol. I: Human Rights and Refugee Protection

The Rwandan Conflict 1994 from '1997 In Review'

Stories from Refugees Magazine Issue N° 109: 1997 In Review, related to Unit plan for ages 12-14 in History: The Rwandan Conflict 1994

Rwanda, Revisiting the Camps

It was the fastest genocide in modern history and ten years on, Rwanda is still trying to pick up the pieces. Seeing today's empty fields, it is difficult to recall the horror of the refugee camps a decade ago. Unfinished business as thousands of Rwandans continue to return home years after the conflict ended.

Stories from Refugees Magazine Issue N° 135: 'New Europe and Asylum. What Next?' related to Unit plan for ages 12-14 in History

The Rwandan Conflict 1994

Related news stories to Unit plan for ages 12-14 in History: The Rwandan conflict 1994

The Rwandan conflict 1994 from 'Crisis in the Great Lakes'

Stories from Refugees Magazine Issue N° 110: Crisis in the Great Lakes related to Unit plan for ages 12-14 in History: The Rwandan Conflict 1994

Related Internet Links

UNHCR is not responsible for the content and availability of external internet sites

Kigeme: A home carved from the hills for Congolese refugees

The Kigeme refugee camp in Rwanda's Southern province was reopened in June 2012 after thousands of Congolese civilians started fleeing across the border when fighting erupted in late April between Democratic Republic of the Congo government forces and fighters of the rebel M23 movement. Built on terraced hills, it currently houses more than 14,000 refugees but was not significantly affected by the latest fighting in eastern Congo, which saw the M23 capture the North Kivu provincial capital, Goma, before withdrawing. While many of the adults long for lasting peace in their home region, the younger refugees are determined to resume their education. Hundreds enrolled in special classes to help them prepare for the Rwandan curriculum in local primary and secondary schools, including learning different languages. In a camp where more than 60 per cent of the population are aged under 18 years, the catch-up classes help traumatized children to move forward, learn and make friends.

Kigeme: A home carved from the hills for Congolese refugees

Keeping Busy in Rwanda's Kiziba Camp

Rwanda's Kiziba Camp was opened in December 1996, after the start of civil war in neighbouring Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). The facility was constructed to help cope with the influx of tens of thousands of Congolese refugees at that time. Some of the refugees have since returned to their homes in eastern DRC, but about 16,000 remain at the remote hilltop camp located in the Western province of Rwanda. Fresh violence last year in DRC's North Kivu province did not affect the camp because new arrivals were accommodated in the reopened Kigeme Camp in Rwanda's Southern province. Most of the refugees in Kiziba have said they do not want to return, but the prospects of local integration is limited by factors such as a lack of land and limited access to employment. In the meantime, people try to lead as normal a life as possible, learning new skills and running small businesses to help them become self-sufficient. For the youth, access to sports and education is very important to ensure that they do not become sidetracked by negative influences as well as to keep up their spirits and hopes for the future.

Keeping Busy in Rwanda's Kiziba Camp

Congolese Refugees flee to Rwanda

In the first ten days of May 2012, more than 6,500 refugees from the Democratic Republic of the Congo crossed into Rwanda, fleeing fighting between the Congolese army and renegade soldiers. UNHCR and its UN partners worked with the Rwandan government to provide the refugees with humanitarian assistance in the early stages of the crisis, and to find solutions until it is safe for them to return.

Some of the refugees walked for days before reaching the Goma-Gisenyi border crossing between Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda. They came with their belongings, including mattresses, clothing, perhaps a few toys for the children. The images are from the border and from the Nkamira Transit Centre, located 22 kilometres inside Rwanda. Accommodation at Nkamira is poor: the centre can only host up to 5,400 individuals. It is only temporary shelter, but numbers continue to swell as hundreds cross the border every day.

Congolese Refugees flee to Rwanda