I. BACKGROUND
1. While UNHCR has provided some assistance and support to environmental activities in refugee situations for many years, it was from 1993 onwards that a focused effort was made to highlight environmental concerns. Speaking at the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro, the High Commissioner affirmed UNHCR's full support for the principles enshrined in the Declaration on Environment and Development, acknowledged UNHCR's role in this context in relation to refugee situations, and outlined the broad elements of a UNHCR policy on the environment.
II. INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS
2. In 1993, the Office of the Senior Coordinator on Environmental Affairs was established, with funding from the Government of Japan. Additional support for environmental activities has come from the Governments of the United States, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, France and the European Union. From 1993 to mid-1999, the Environment Unit was headed by three successive Senior Coordinators for Environmental Affairs, each Coordinator being seconded from the Japanese Environment Agency fora period of two years. In 1999, the Environment Unit merged with technical staff from the former Programme and Technical Support Service (PTSS) to create an integrated Engineering and Environmental Services Section (EESS) within the Division of Operational Support.
3. Reflecting on this period in general terms, the main activities undertaken can be grouped into three phases: policy and programme development, programme implementation, and integration and mainstreaming. This conference room paper attempts to outline some of the main steps of this process and,in particular, to identify some of the most beneficial aspects of UNHCR's environmental work, as well as some of the challenges that lie ahead. A draft conclusion is contained in Annex 2 for endorsement by the Standing Committee.
III. ACTIVITIES AND ACHIEVEMENTS*
Policy Development
4. In July 1994, Interim Guidelines for Environment-Sensitive Management of Refugee Programmes were introduced to reinforce environmental operations in the field. Although the Interim Guidelines were considered as a first positive step in addressing environmental issues, they fell short of providing clear directions, procedures and technical solutions. Furthermore, due to their interim nature, insufficient attention was given to them both at Headquarters and in the field.
5. At its forty-fifth session in October 1994, the Executive Committee adopted a conclusion on refugees and the environment with the aim of mitigating the environmental impact of the presence of refugees. In December 1994, UNHCR's Senior Management Committee decided to establish an internal Working Group on the Environment. The final report of the Working Group issued in July 1995, reviewed UNHCR's policy on the environment and proposed a number of refinements to it. It received the broad endorsement of UNHCR's Senior Management Committee. UNHCR's reformulated policy on the environment was approved at the forty-sixth session of the Executive Committee in October 1995. In parallel to this, an Environmental Coordination Group (ECG) was formed at Headquarters, with a view to enhance coordination amongst Divisions and Bureaux. A total of 15 staff members were drawn from various services to guide the emerging Environment Unit and promote environmental policy in a more comprehensive and coordinated manner.
6. With input from the ECG, the UNHCR Environmental Guidelines were published in 1996. These Guidelines were based on four key principles -- integration, prevention before cure, cost-effectiveness, and local participation -- and have remained the foundation of the Office's environmental work. The Standing Committee reviewed these guidelines in January 1997 (EC/47/SC/CRP.8) and expressed broad support for UNHCR's environmental policy and the activities undertaken to support it.
Implementation
7. Activities have focused primarily on programme management and coordination within Headquarters, and support of field projects in association with Branch Offices. A range of activities have been supported, including:
8. Since 1993, and in particular from 1996 onwards, the Environment Unit actively supported a number of model field projects, throughout the world. Intended primarily to introduce and implement UNHCR's Environmental Guidelines, these projects have also played an important role in raising awareness for environmental concerns during different stages of refugee operations.
9. Emerging from the 1996 workshop on Environmentally-induced Population Displacements and Environmental Impacts Resulting from Mass Migrations, and with funding from the Governments of the Netherlands, Switzerland and the USA, the Environment Unit coordinated the Towards Sustainable Environmental Management Practices in Refugee-Affected Areas (TSEMPRAA) project. TSEMPRAA's main objectives are to:
10. Several major outputs from this project were published in 1998. Selected Lessons Learned is a synthesis of experience gained in environmental management in refugee operations worldwide. Key Principles for Decision-making highlights issues to enable decision-makers reach conclusions and take appropriate actions on issues connected with environmental management. The findings from field missions have also contributed to the development of a training module, which is now being used for self-study within UNHCR, as well as among implementing partners. Environmentally-Friendlier Procurement Guidelines and separate environmental guidelines on Forestry, Domestic Energy and Livestock were published.
Integration and Mainstreaming
11. The above-mentioned activities created a solid platform on which to advance. Mainstreaming environmental concerns in UNHCR operations became a priority in 1998 and was addressed by encouraging the integration of environmental components into Operations Management System (OMS) tools, the Global Appeal, Global Report, Country Operations Plans, the Emergency Handbook and similar outputs. A questionnaire was also widely distributed to the field in 1999 to determine interest and needs with regard to environmental support activities in different countries. Other awareness raising tools were also produced, again with a particular audience in mind. Among these were:
12. Furthermore, other activities include the development of a monitoring initiative for environmental activities. Based on the concept of a Score Card -- which is a simple means of recording change in a given issue or feature, such as the number of surviving seedlings per season -- this initiative is now being tested in the field. The results from this and other mapping-related activities will feed into UNHCR's Environmental Database, which uses geographical information system technology to analyse and present the data in appropriate forms for various end users.
IV. LESSONS LEARNT
13. Five areas stand out where the effectiveness of UNHCR's efforts to mainstream environmental concerns has been demonstrated:
14. The following factors have contributed to the success of UNHCR's efforts to mainstream environmental considerations in its programmes:
Playing a Catalytic Role
15. Environmental management is not a new concern, but it is often overlooked in refugee situations. In addition to being an important stimulus, a small Unit dedicated to developing and promoting suitable responses to environmental concerns has sent a strong message to the field -- to UNHCR's offices as well as to implementing partners -- that environment matters in refugee operations.
Working from a Sound Foundation
16. Although it was time-consuming to prepare and secure broad agreement, the benefit of having an approved institutional policy and guidelines was a major contributing factor in recognizing environmental concerns. This was not only important at Headquarters level, but also in the field and among implementing partners and government agencies. In this respect, promotion of environmental concerns also benefited from the fact that UNHCR had intervened in this arena for several years beforehand, so many of the issues were not new. The High Commissioner's personal support and advocacy also gave environmental policies an important status, on a level with other programme policy issues.
Having Funds with which to Launch Environmental Initiatives
17. Having funds to actively support promotion of the Environmental Guidelines was undoubtedly a major contributing factor to the acceptance and implementation of recommended environmental practices and actions. In some cases, this was reinforced by having an interested and able person on the ground, who effectively assumed responsibility for ensuring environmental inputs to projects and other activities.
Having Flexibility to Work
18. Having funds on hand meant that the Environment Unit and EESS could respond quickly and efficiently to requests from the field -- from the provision of a global positioning system (which costs around $ 40) to projects with a budget of more than $ 600,000. The range and variety of projects and activities supported by the Environment Unit and EESS are evidence of the benefit of that flexibility. Such activities include:
Worldwide
Country specific
Providing Technical Assistance
19. The newly established EESS offers technical assistance to help ensure that environmental concerns are taken into account in project design and implementation. In part, this is a follow-up to a 1998 global request to UNHCR field operations enquiring where assistance was needed with the planning and implementation of environment-related aspects.
Effective Partnerships
20. Regular links have been maintained with implementing partners, such as UNESCO's Programme of Education for Emergencies and Reconstruction for environmental education. Fostering inter-agency cooperation was also an important aspect of the TSEMPRAA project. The Steering Committee included implementing partner agencies such as NGOs, and government officials, United Nations organizations including the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and donor representatives. Moreover, the few meetings and workshops organized around this activity served as a useful forum for these actors to share their experiences in the area of environmental management of refugee operations. This model is now being applied again to a three-year project with the Fonds Français pour l'Environnement Mondial (FFEM) to develop a framework for environmental assessment and monitoring in refugee situations.
21. Involving others in refugee-related environmental work has helped shape the policies of other organizations. For example, the Lutheran World Federation's Environmental Guidelines (1997), the Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency's Guidelines for Environmental Assessment in Development Work (1998), and the World Food Programme's 1999 Environmental Review Guidelines, each acknowledges UNHCR's environmental work. These relationships with United Nations agencies and NGOs are mutually enriching, as lessons learned are shared and applied more widely.
22. UNEP is a crucial partner of UNHCR. In line with its mandate to develop global, regional and national environmental strategies, UNEP can provide technical expertise in assessment and monitoring of environmental projects. UNHCR has recently been associated with UNEP in such activities in Guinea and Kosovo.
Outreach Materials
23. The production of public awareness materials has helped raise the profile of UNHCR's environmental work. Refugees and the Environment -- Caring for the Future, translated into many languages, was followed by the outputs of the TSEMPRAA project -- Refugee Operations and Environmental Management: Selected Lessons Learned, targeted at field staff and partner organizations, and Key Principles for Decision-making, a distilled version of the former publication targeted specifically at decision-makers. Government officials, implementing partners and UNHCR field staff frequently refer to these publications in planning and implementing activities in the field of environment.
Practical Training Materials and Support to the Field
24. UNHCR's experience with environmental issues is now also being promoted through training workshops for UNHCR and implementing partner staff. The first workshop was held in Addis Ababa (for the Horn of Africa and East Africa) in October 1998. This was followed by workshops in New Delhi for South Asia, Johannesburg for Southern Africa and Nairobi for the Great Lakes region.
25. The various lessons learned have also helped define areas in need of improvement. They have included:
V. FUTURE DIRECTIONS
26. While much has been achieved, there is still a great deal to be done, particularly to maintain the momentum that now exists and to provide continued support to the field, including implementing partners. Among the identified needs are the following:
27. One of the strongest arguments for caring for the environment during all phases of a refugee operation remains the defence of asylum. Assisting hosting countries to enhance their capacity to receive refugees is a priority for UNHCR. In the future, the Office will continue to work with its partners to prevent and mitigate environmental damage associated with the presence of refugees, translating its policy commitment into action and results in the field.
Annex 1
KEY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES AT A GLANCE
Annex 2
Draft Conclusion
Mainstreaming Environmental Concerns in Refugee Operations
The Standing Committee,
Recognizing the activities already undertaken by UNHCR to mainstream environmental considerations into its programmes,
OP1 Notes the usefulness of the environmental policy and guidelines developed by UNHCR;
OP2 Welcomes UNHCR's continued efforts to develop and promote suitable responses to environmental concerns in refugee operations through the integration of environmental principles into its management and training tools;
OP3 Encourages UNHCR to enhance its collaboration with other specialized agencies concerned with environmental management, particularly the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), notably in addressing the environmental impact of large numbers of refugees on host countries;
OP4 Further encourages UNHCR, with relevant agencies, to promote adequate assessment and monitoring of environmental activities in refugee hosting and returnee areas.
Note
* Key events and activities at a glance are contained in annex.