Last Updated: Monday, 04 June 2012, 13:21 GMT  
Title Hadavand v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Publisher United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Country United States of America
Publication Date 2 June 1993
Citation / Document Symbol 995 F.2d 1062
Reference 93-1248
Cite as Hadavand v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 995 F.2d 1062, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2 June 1993, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b67818.html [accessed 4 June 2012]
Comments Filed: 2 June, 1993 Decision without published opinion
DisclaimerThis is not a UNHCR publication. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it necessarily endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author or publisher and do not necessarily reflect those of UNHCR, the United Nations or its Member States.

Hadavand v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

KEIKHOSRO HADAVAND, Petitioner, v. U.S. IMMIGRATION &
NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.
No. 93-1248 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
June 7, 1993, Submitted
June 21, 1993, Decided

Prior History:

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration and Naturalization Service. (A-41-702-957)

Counsel:

Keikhosro Hadavand, Petitioner Pro Se.

Richard Michael Evans, Stewart Deutsch, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Judges:

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Opinion By:

PER CURIAM

Opinion:

OPINION

PER CURIAM: Keikhosro Hadavand filed a petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming the immigration judge's order of exclusion and finding of Hadavand's statutory ineligibility for asylum and a waiver of deportation. The Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) filed a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the applicable law discloses that we are without jurisdiction to hear this petition for review. See 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(b)(1988). Judicial review of an order of exclusion is by habeas corpus proceedings in the appropriate district court. Id. Accordingly, we grant the motion of the INS and dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Topics: Deportation, Denial of refugee status,


Region maps Americas Africa Europe Asia Oceania
Page generated in 0.02 seconds