| Title | Skeleton Argument on Behalf of the Intervener (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), in the Court of Appeal (C/2002/0751) on Appeal from the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, between Amer Mohammed El-Ali (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent) |
| Publisher | UN High Commissioner for Refugees |
| Country | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Occupied Palestinian Territory |
| Publication Date | 26 June 2002 |
| Related Document | Amer Mohammed El-Ali v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department and Daraz v. The Secretary of State for the Home Department (The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Intervener) |
| Cite as | UN High Commissioner for Refugees, Skeleton Argument on Behalf of the Intervener (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees), in the Court of Appeal (C/2002/0751) on Appeal from the Immigration Appeal Tribunal, between Amer Mohammed El-Ali (Appellant) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent), 26 June 2002, available at: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3d1c73c04.html [accessed 17 February 2012] |
| Comments | Amicus curiae brief on specific aspects of the interpretation of Article 1D of the 1951 Convention, which was submitted by UNHCR to the Court of Appeals in London on 26 June. This brief was prepared by Professor Guy Goodwin-Gill in cooperation with BO London and DIP. |
Topics: International protection, Persons not in need of international protection, Convention definition,
- Search
- Regions
- Countries