No crime, no sentence, but refugees in Bangkok languish in detention

Telling the Human Story, 9 July 2009

© UNHCR/I.Earp-Jones
New arrivals play basketball at a refugee resettlement centre in Auckland, New Zealand. After two years in a Thai detention centre, Ghanashyam and his family began a new life in New Zealand earlier this month.

BANGKOK, Thailand, July 9 (UNHCR) Bhumika Dhakal, a tall, capable 12-year-old Nepalese refugee girl was sweeping the floor and looking after her three younger sisters when police knocked on the door of their home before breakfast two years ago and carted them away.

"My parents had gone out and told me to clean up," she recalls now from inside Bangkok's crowded Immigration Detention Centre (IDC). "There was also a Sri Lankan woman rounded up. She asked if she could go to the park to get her children before we were taken away. She also told me it was a good idea to take some clothes, so I packed a small bag quickly. My nine-year-old sister was crying but the rest of us, even the two-year-old, just all got into the van quietly."

Despite the fact that the family all had refugee protection letters from UNHCR the parents were arrested later in the day when they returned home they languished in the IDC for two years, about the average time for refugees arrested in Bangkok. Although the Thai capital is now home to 2,150 refugees and asylum seekers (separate from some 112,000 refugees from Myanmar who live in remote camps in northern Thailand), urban refugees here live in fear of arrest.

Thailand regards all urban refugees as illegal migrants if they do not have valid passports and visas. Last year, UNHCR managed to win the release of about half of those arrested by Thai police.

The real problem arises when they are transferred to the IDC where some 189 refugees now reside because detention there is indefinite, despite the fact that the refugees have committed no crime. Two refugees have been held there for seven years and still see no hope of release.

"I felt like I died," says Bhumika's father, Ghanashyam Dkakal, when he found out his children had been locked up and that the same fate awaited him and his wife. "The basic problem is the education of the children. These girls should be studying, not spending two years in cells."

He is detained in a men's cell separately from his wife, who stays with the four girls, now aged four to 14, in a cell intended for 150 but now housing 400 women and children. Ghanashyam says he can't understand why the family was arrested, and does not know what purpose their prolonged detention is serving. It's a special anguish not to know how long they have to stay here.

The mental pressure caused by their legal limbo and the reality of the crowded cells mean that "from the time we have been at IDC, the children have been able to sleep maybe 50 percent of the time."

Sleep is also a major issue for a Sri Lankan woman who's spent almost two years in IDC, longer than she was married to her husband before they were arrested together. "There is not enough space to lie down. For two or three days I have to sleep sitting up, so I have developed back problems," says 24-year-old Mathi.* Detainees complain that cells are crowded and that there are only four latrines for the 400 people.

The torment of detention is compounded by "having no idea how long we will stay here," says Mathi's husband, Sivanathan.* "I feel my life is finished," the 38-year-old Sri Lankan says. "All I did was come and ask protection from the UN. I keep thinking, what mistake did I do?"

Now held in a separate cell from his wife, allowed to see her for only one-and-a-half hours a week, he's wracked with guilt that he inadvertently aggravated her suffering. "When we were outside, my wife wanted to have a child very badly. I used to tell her, this is not a proper country for us. We will go for resettlement in a third country and then we will plan to have a child." He's not sure that day will ever come.

For her part, Mathi's dreams are modest. "Most of the ladies don't get a good husband, but I got a good husband who doesn't have any bad habits. But I can't live with him. I don't know if I will have to live my whole life alone. I will be grateful to you if you just let me live with him."

For Ghanashyam, his wife and four daughters, detention suddenly came to an end in early July, when they flew out of Bangkok to begin life anew in New Zealand under UNHCR's third-country resettlement programme. Before he left, he had a plea for the world: "No country should put people into cells if they know refugees have international protection. If any government could show some amnesty, some sympathy and not arrest refugees like us, it would be a conquering day."

*Names changed for protection reasons

By Kitty McKinsey in Bangkok, Thailand





An alternative for those who cannot go home, made possible by UNHCR and governments.

Resettlement from Tunisia's Choucha Camp

Between February and October 2011, more than 1 million people crossed into Tunisia to escape conflict in Libya. Most were migrant workers who made their way home or were repatriated, but the arrivals included refugees and asylum-seekers who could not return home or live freely in Tunisia.

UNHCR has been trying to find solutions for these people, most of whom ended up in the Choucha Transit Camp near Tunisia's border with Libya. Resettlement remains the most viable solution for those registered as refugees at Choucha before a cut-off date of December 1, 2011.

As of late April, 14 countries had accepted 2,349 refugees for resettlement, 1,331 of whom have since left Tunisia. The rest are expected to leave Choucha later this year. Most have gone to Australia, Norway and the United States. But there are a more than 2,600 refugees and almost 140 asylum-seekers still in the camp. UNHCR continues to advocate with resettlement countries to find solutions for them.

Resettlement from Tunisia's Choucha Camp

Sri Lanka: IDPs and Returnees

During Sri Lanka's 20-year civil war more than 1 million people were uprooted from their homes or forced to flee, often repeatedly. Many found shelter in UNHCR-supported Open Relief Centers, in government welfare centers or with relatives and friends.

In February 2002, the Sri Lankan government and the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) signed a cease-fire accord and began a series of talks aimed at negotiating a lasting peace. By late 2003, more than 300,000 internally displaced persons had returned to their often destroyed towns and villages.

In the midst of these returns, UNHCR provided physical and legal protection to war affected civilians – along with financing a range of special projects to provide new temporary shelter, health and sanitation facilities, various community services, and quick and cheap income generation projects.

Sri Lanka: IDPs and Returnees

Picking Up the Pieces in Sri Lanka

In an unprecedented response to a natural disaster, the U.N. refugee agency – whose mandate is to protect refugees fleeing violence and persecution – has kicked off a six-month, multi-million dollar emergency relief operation to aid tsunami victims in Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Somalia. UNHCR has worked in Sri Lanka for nearly 20 years and has the largest operational presence in the country with seven offices, 113 staff and a strong network of partnerships in place. The day of the tsunami, UNHCR opened up its warehouses in the island nation and began distributing existing stockpiles – including plastic sheeting, cooking sets and clothing for 100,000 people.

UNHCR estimates that some 889,000 people are now displaced in Sri Lanka, including many who were already displaced by the long-running conflict in the north. Prior to the tsunami, UNHCR assisted 390,000 people uprooted by the war. UNHCR is now expanding its logistical and warehouse capacity throughout the island to facilitate delivery of relief items to the needy populations, including in the war-affected area. The refugee agency is currently distributing relief items and funding mobile health clinics to assist the injured and sick.

Picking Up the Pieces in Sri Lanka

From refugee 'Lost Boy' to state education ministerPlay video

From refugee 'Lost Boy' to state education minister

The subject of the best-selling book What is the What, Valentino Achak Deng's journey has taken him from Sudanese 'Lost Boy' to education minister in his home state in South Sudan. He talks here about the causes of displacement, the risks of politicizing refugee resettlement, and the opportunities that come with staying positive.
IOM Director General Swing Remarks on the Resettlement of Refugees from Bhutan in NepalPlay video

IOM Director General Swing Remarks on the Resettlement of Refugees from Bhutan in Nepal

The UN refugee agency and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) marked a major milestone: the resettlement of over 100,000 refugees from Bhutan in Nepal to third countries since the launch of the programme in 2007.
High Commissioner Guterres Remarks on the resettlement of Refugees from Bhutan in NepalPlay video

High Commissioner Guterres Remarks on the resettlement of Refugees from Bhutan in Nepal

The UN refugee agency and the International Organization for Migration (IOM) marked a major milestone: the resettlement of over 100,000 refugees from Bhutan in Nepal to third countries since the launch of the programme in 2007.